Indian Idol 11: Aditya Narayan Shares His Opinion on Anu Malik’s #MeToo Controversy

Launch Date of Vikram Singh Chauhan’s Yeh Jadu Hai Jinn Ka Revealed
September 24, 2019
Saand Ki Aankh: Taapsee Pannu trained for three months to hold a pistol and learn shooting
September 24, 2019

Indian Idol 11: Aditya Narayan Shares His Opinion on Anu Malik’s #MeToo Controversy

Anu Malik is back on the making a decision about board of “Indian Idol” in the wake of being blamed for sexual unfortunate behavior. The show’s host Aditya Narayan says on the off chance that someone has not been lawfully charged of accomplishing something, at that point you can’t anticipate that the person in question should sit at home.

Anu was expelled from the jury board of “Indian Idol” in the wake of being blamed for sexual offense a year ago. Presently he has been rehired as one of the judges of the up and coming eleventh period of the singing-based unscripted television appear.

This move, in any case, turned out poorly well with a few people, including vocalist Sona Mohapatra, who had leveled the charges against Anu.

Asked who will be seen facilitating “Indian Idol” this year, about the creators’ choice of rehiring Anu as a judge, Aditya told the source: “Anuji is one of the most cherished and regarded performers. Truth be told, I owe a great deal to him since I sang my first historically speaking Bollywood tune for him for ‘Akele Hum Akele Tum’ film.

“I have monstrous regard for him however genuinely you truly don’t know anybody totally. You don’t realize anybody from head to toe regardless of whether you have been with them.You don’t have the foggiest idea about each and every part of their life. There is no point for me on remarking on Anuji and his life. Supposedly, he is a great person. He has consistently been decent to me. These charges originate from the contrary sexual orientation.”

The youthful artist bolsters the #MeToo movement.”Women ought not be dealt with the manner in which they have been purportedly treated. Everything needs to experience the request for the law and I trust our jury takes the correct choice,” said Aditya.

Aditya likewise shared that in the event that somebody has not been legitimately refuted, he/she ought not be banned from working. “In the event that someone has not been lawfully charged of doing something…then you can’t generally hold a firearm to their head and anticipate that them should sit at home. Anuji has a family. He has two superb girls. I am certain the young ladies are in that age where they should be upheld. I don’t have the foggiest idea whether it’s actual or not.”

“Until demonstrated else, I figure you should let the individuals who are supposedly blamed, to keep working. I am not naming anyone however ya on the off chance that somebody is blameworthy, at that point that individual ought to be rebuffed,” Aditya said uninvolved of his presentation for the as of late held philanthropy pledge drive occasion by People For Animals and Reliance in Delhi.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Captcha loading...